Search: Site   Web

Madison Taylor


From the editor's desk

Blanche Moore: A neverending story

February 9th, 2010, 12:26 pm by madisontaylor

Blanche Moore and her attorney in a photo taken during her trial in Winston-Salem.

ON TV: “Infamous Black Widows,” CNBC, 9 p.m. Wednesday. Cable channel 30 locally.

I hadn’t been a city editor at the Times-News very long when I first heard the name Blanche Taylor Moore. In the days, months and years that followed I’d come to know it well. Probably too well. Blanche Moore, it seems, never goes completely away.

The year was 1989. I moved from sports writer to weekend editor in 1988. In 1989 I was promoted to city editor. I wasn’t really ready for what was to come — not by a longshot. None of our mainly young reporters was  either. Maybe no one could be.

It started when the executive editor at the time, Don Bolden told us about a pastor from a local church who had become ill while honeymooning in New Jersey. His ailment was a mystery so far. Doctors were puzzled about what might have happened to the Rev. Dwight Moore. I had one of our reporters, Alex Martin, check it out. He was shaken after talking to the pastor’s new bride.

Alex was the color of notebook paper when he walked to my desk. The new bride, Blanche Moore, had become upset by his call. She would only say that her husband was, “very, very sick,” before hanging up in sobs. Across the way sat Jim Wicker. Jim wasn’t a green rookie when it came to reporting. He’d not only been around the block but he wrote the story when the block was constructed.

Jim looked at Alex through a haze of cigarette smoke and announced that Alex “shouldn’t worry about it because the wife probably did it and I’ll bet she poisoned him.”

In the following days and weeks it would become clear that Wicker was perhaps onto something. Blanche Moore emerged as the leading suspect and the story became this ever-growing boulder careening downhill. Despite the fact that she wasn’t charged for weeks, print and TV media reported exhaustively — and at times irresponsibly — on what was clearly a major story about a woman who possibly poisoned men with arsenic. Burlington police, the investigation led by Steve Lynch who is now with the District Attorney’s office, were overwhelmed with requests for investigations into the deaths of those whose paths crossed with Blanche Moore. Graves were exhumed and bodies tested for traces of the poison. Families were torn and longtime community divisions created.

The media swarm grew. Newspapers from around the nation arrived to write their own stories about Blanche Taylor Moore. All the major networks arrived at one time or another.  Since every reporter was  looking for fresh news, competition to unveil new facts became hyper-intense. Our reporters, Frank Maley, Alex Martin and L.D. Ashmore were under tremendous pressure. Sleep was in short supply for all of us.

The story took dozens of bizarre twists and turns that didn’t end when the case went to trial in Forsyth County where Blanche Moore was eventually charged and convicted for the murder of Raymond Reid, a former boyfriend who lived in Kernersville.  Even the prosecutors found themselves involved in odd circumstances — including accusations of book or TV deals prior to the trial. Her story has been produced twice for TV movies and has been chronicled in at least two books. Elizabeth Montgomery of “Bewitched” portrayed Blanche Moore in one movie that crops up on Lifetime every so often.

Blanche Moore remains on Death Row in the North Carolina’s Central Prison and continues to maintain that she’s innocent. She was the subject of a fascinating interview and story by our current managing editor Jay Ashley. Jay covered her trial for another publication. L.D. Ashmore,who now lives in Georgia, covered the trial for the Times-News.

Now Blanche Moore’s story is part of a CNBC documentary, Infamous Black Widows. It looks at nearly a dozen cases about women who killed by poison. Oddly enough, North Carolina’s other famous arsenic poisoner, Velma Barfield, is not included.

Into the Black Hole: I should have known

February 8th, 2010, 11:24 am by madisontaylor

URGENT! To those who write to our Open Forum via our Web site. DON’T, at least not for awhile.

Over the weekend I received this e-mail message:

“Madison, I have submitted 3 different letters to the editor over the last several months. Not one was published. Have I been censored by the Times News. Thanks in advance. Rebecca Thompson”

I’m always crushed by a message like this one. Ms. Thompson has written letters to the editor before without problem. Usually all I have to do is ring her up and verify that she’s the sender. She’s never libelous or treads into areas where her work wouldn’t be published.

And it’s likely she didn’t this time.

What did happen, best I can figure, is that she used our Web template to submit a letter. Many have in the past and perhaps still do. But I have to admit I haven’t seen one in a few months. In December we changed our e-mail provider and at that time also made a change in our online letters system in an attempt to eiminate a pretty serious spam problem.

What it did, however, was eliminate everything.

Our technical folks are working on this now and I thank Ms. Thompson for bringing the matter to my attention. I ask people who wish to send letters online to do so by e-mail to this address: mtaylor@thetimesnews.com.

Thanks and I apologize for this problem.

Some ground rules for the political marathon

February 6th, 2010, 8:03 pm by madisontaylor

 

My print column this week deals with the long election season ahead.

—————————————————————–

If I hadn’t seen it for myself, I probably wouldn’t have believed it.

But there was no denying what I saw on page A3 of the Times-News, a rectangular box with the headline, “Sharpe: District Attorney.”

I couldn’t remember the last time I saw a local political campaign advertisement before the actual filing period began. And this one by Robbie Sharpe, a Republican who announced his intention to seek the job  shortly after former District Attorney Rob Johnson was appointed to a judgeship in the fall, has already been around the block once or twice.

So if Sharpe gets through the May GOP primary, he’ll be campaigning into November. For those not keeping score at home, that’s almost a year of nonstop running. Ladies and gentlemen, I’d call that a marathon. It’s a welcome one, too. Keep those political ads coming I say.

Yes, presidential politics have been a 24/7, 365-day yearly grind for some time now. The truth is, the eventual presidential survivor these days is so double-dog worn down by the entire  experience that they only fully recover after their monumental library is fully constructed two years after leaving office.

And that’s if they’re lucky.

Running for local offices hasn’t reached that point, not by a long shot. But a lot of people have already announced their intentions to run for a variety of offices in Alamance County, which is taking a lot of the mystery out of the filing period, which begins on Monday and ends on Feb. 26.

For example, we already know that the prosecutor appointed by the governor to replace Johnson, Democrat Patrick Nadolski, is going to run because he held a press conference and said so with his family and supporters in tow and everything. A handful of people have stated their intention to seek one of three seats open on the non-partisan Alamance-Burlington Board of Education. A few are taking aim at two four-year seats on the Alamance County Board of Commissioners while a couple of others are looking at the special two-year vacancy. And popular incumbent Republican Sheriff Terry Johnson will face a challenge in November from a Democrat because at least one, Ron Parrish, has said publicly he intends to run.

Now whether Parrish has any primary challenge in May is still unknown. So maybe there’s some mystery to the filing period after all.

I, for one, am glad of that. Political campaigns, after all, need a little drama, a touch of suspense and just a dash of intrigue. Otherwise they would come to resemble one long and excruciating episode of that kid’s program starring Barney the Dinosaur — only with barbecue.

So with the election season set to open, I thought now might be the time to tackle some frequently asked questions about how we handle election coverage at the Times-News.

 Will there be daily coverage of the filing period?

Yes. For candidates that’s both good and bad. If only one person files on a given day, then they get the spotlight all to themselves. If eight people file, well, you know the rest. Space will only allow us to print so much on a given day.

And please, candidates, return phone calls.

 Will the Times-News host candidate forums this year?

Hopefully. The May primary is up in the air because we have no idea how many races will be contested. It’s hard to have a one-person debate.

But bank on forums in the fall if I have anything to say about it.

 Does the Times-News endorse candidates?

No. As a newspaper owned by Libertarians — for now anyway — we barely endorse elections, much less candidates. And I’ve come to believe that voters don’t give one hoot who the newspaper endorses — and they shouldn’t. People need to make up their own minds.

 If I write a letter endorsing a candidate would you publish it?

Yes, but only one per person per election. And please keep endorsement letters brief, shoot for 150 words or less. Stay clear of libel and do not attack another candidate in the election.

Guest columns endorsing or criticizing candidates will not be published.

 Can a candidate for office have a letter to the editor published?

Not usually. Candidates will be given leeway to correct errors by writing a letter but generally should put their issue messages in political advertising.

 So, will you be glad when all of this is over?

You have no idea.

Allred keeps himself in the news

February 3rd, 2010, 7:22 pm by madisontaylor

I’ve been back in Burlington long enough to know when Cary Allred’s going to call me and complain about something in a story. I can almost set my watch by it.

I’m not saying the former state legislator, who resigned his seat last summer  just ahead of public disclosure of a House investigation into his questionable conduct was released, is completely predictable. Sometimes he even barks about news items in which he’s not mentioned at all. Those stories, though, usually involve his political foes Henry Vines or state Rep. Alice Bordsen.

But when my phone rang about 10 minutes after reporter Robert Boyer got off the phone with Allred late Wednesday, I checked the incoming number to see if it was who I figured it might be. Bingo. If I could take this particular talent to Las Vegas, I’d be retired on an island somewhere sipping drinks covered by little umbrellas.

Now usually I pick up the phone when Allred calls  because I actually like talking to him. It’s sometimes enlightening, often entertaining, frequently maddening and always invigorating. Tonight, I let it go to voicemail. After all, I knew what he was going to say. And besides, I wanted to get home and eat dinner.

Here’s the message.

“Are you going to let Bob Boyer rehash all this poppycock again? It’s, it’s overkill is what it is.”

Allred is referring to a story in Thursday’s Times-News (State: Allred can’t use campaign funds for legal expenses), which is on our Web site now. It’s about the state turning down Allred’s request to use his war chest of campaign contributions to pay his legal fees in connection to a speeding ticket Allred got from the state Highway Patrol for driving in excess of 100 mph on the interstate  to a nighttime session of the General Assembly. That evening, by the way, was the beginning of the end of Allred’s tenure in the House. The investigation stemmed from his actions that night when he hugged a teenage page who is a family friend, became loud and argumentative with House Speaker Joe Hackney and famously admitted to drinking a chelada before driving to Raleigh from his home in Burlington.

Allred is right in one respect and I’ve said so before. That particular night has been overblown. But it keeps coming up again because Allred has a habit of  publicly setting himself on fire and daring the media to report about it.

The story tonight is an example. Allred actually made the request in November to use campaign contributions to pay court costs and his attorney. He argues that it was an expense incurred while doing his job as a legislator and that is allowed by law. Personally I’d argue that any use of campaign contributions for anything other than signs, bumper stickers and advertising is plain wrong — but that’s another debate.

The state Board of Elections Chairman Gary Bartlett wrote Allred a letter in December denying the request on the grounds that Allred made a decision to break the law, something that had nothing to do with his job as a lawmaker.

The case appeared in February’s N.C. Register, which is where it got the attention of one of our readers who pointed it out to us today.

Because it was a story about campaign finances and the actions of a politician who may well run for office again someday, we pursued it.  Give Allred credit for this, he didn’t just take the money without asking. I know politicians who would and then claim no knowledge of the law when investigators come calling. In that respect, he did the right thing. And Allred isn’t the first person to make such a request. As I recall, Bill Clinton tried to do something similar when he was president, was denied and set up an outside legal defense fund. Stories were done about that, too. Such stories are written anytime a politician makes such a request.

While Clinton’s legal bills were in the millions, Allred says his amounted to about $1,800 — not much to pay really considering that Allred enjoys telling people he’s a millionaire.

Allred still contends that he’s entitled to use his campaign money in this way because he wouldn’t have been speeding were he not headed for a session of the General Assembly. That’s ridiculous and most know it.  By making this argument — and the addtional one that driving 102 mph can be excused when one car is passing another — illustrates that Allred, like many in politics, often loses some contact with reality. Campaign contributions aren’t his personal discretionary slush fund. It wouldn’t have dawned on me to ask for such a favor were I in Allred’s position.

Then again, Allred also says that other travelers on I-85 and I-40 drive 102 so why shouldn’t he? This kind of  logic makes me wonder if his alternate universe is some massive kindergarten.

Allred told Boyer in our story that the newspaper is trying to ruin his reputation and besmirch his 29 years of good service in state and local politics. I can assure him that nothing is further from the truth. In fact, for most Allred is becoming a tiresome subject. Our job, though, is to report what happens when we hear about it.

Allred is doing a good job of destroying his legacy all by himself.

Book review: Dangerously Funny, The Uncensored Story of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour

February 2nd, 2010, 4:41 pm by madisontaylor

n Dangerously Funny: The Uncensored Story of the Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour, by David Bianculli, Touchstone, 382 pages, $24.99.

  It’s hard to believe but there was a time when cable TV didn’t exist, when three powerful networks offered the only television programming options available to millions of Americans and the concept of channel surfing seemed as foreign as the ability to record shows to watch later.

That was the landscape at 9 p.m., Feb. 3, 1967 when Tom and Dick Smothers ushered in a new era of television with the debut of “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour,” a variety show that became the most controversial program of its time, certainly the most censored by network executives and one that earned the consternation of two presidents who made their displeasure known to CBS.

And when it was cancelled after three rambunctious but creative seasons (Tom Smothers prefers the word fired), TV was never really the same again.

Longtime TV critic David Bianculli, whose career includes 14 years at the New York Daily News, gives a detailed look at how Tom and Dick Smothers rose from California nightclub folk singers with a knack for comedy, to TV music and comedy impresarios while still in their 20s. Along the way Tom Smothers, the leader of the duo, stomped repeatedly on a lot of big executive toes, fought for political and socially relevant content on a show that was equal parts old school variety and comedy, counter-culture vaudeville with a little rock’n’roll mixed in. It was a combination that to the surprise of TV executives propelled that quirky show into among the Top 20 most watched in the nation.

And it was accomplished on Sunday night in a deadly time slot against “Bonanza,” an eponymous western that was among the most popular shows of the 1960s, a slot where CBS had tried and failed numerous times before putting “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour” there because nothing was left to lose.

On the latter score, as it turned out, programmers at CBS were both right — and wrong.

Bianculli covers this ground episode by episode pointing to the brothers’ hits, misses and flat-out guesses at what an ever more diverse TV audience might be looking for as the 1960s reached its height of youth culture hipness and political radicalism. The Smothers Brothers didn’t just tag along for a ride as the youth movement and opposition to the war in Vietnam grew — they drove the psychedelic van.

The ride was a bumpy one — not only for the brothers but a staid network built upon tame and safe programs such as “The Ed Sullivan Show.” As the Smothers Brothers grew in popularity, so did Tom Smothers’ relentless and agitated battles with network censors — often to the point of argument for its own sake. The escalating insubordination by Tom Smothers,, much of it played out in newspaper stories, coupled with a decline in the show’s popularity in the third season, led to a predictable outcome just weeks after the show was renewed for what would have been a fourth season.

Along the way, however, Bianculli successfully argues that in many respects, Tom Smothers accomplished his primary goal — to make viewers of that era think. He also ultimately changed the direction of television. The list of achievements by “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour” is impressive.

n It launched or boosted the comedy careers of Pat Paulsen, George Carlin, Flip Wilson, Steve Martin, Rob Reiner and Bob Einstein — the latter famous for creating the character Super Dave Osborne in the 1980s.

n Paulsen’s deadpan delivery came in handy for lampooning everything from TV news editorials to the race for president. Paulsen’s Quixotic run for office in 1968 long predates and likely inspired the 1980s Garry Trudeau cable program “Tanner 88” and the 2008 presidential bid by Comedy Network’s Steven Colbert.

n Musically the show was groundbreaking. It introduced the nation to the Doors, The Who, Jefferson Airplane, Glen Campbell, Simon and Garfunkel, The Association, Cream and literally dozens of other rock and folk performers who would go on to mega-careers. A performance by The Who, included an infamous explosion that was much larger than planned, followed by the band destroying its guitars before a national TV audience. Later, the American debut of The Beatles “Hey Jude” and “Revolution” was broadcast on “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour.” Its biggest coup was ending the TV blacklist of controversial folk singer Pete Seeger who was eventually allowed to perform his anti-war song, “Waist Deep in the Big Muddy.”

n Tom Smothers introduced an “in-the-round” format of programs with a stage surrounded by an audience with long musical performances by artists like Johnny Cash and Joan Baez.

n And it spawned edgy comedy programs ranging from “Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In” to “Saturday Night Live.”

Bianculli’s contention that “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour” altered the course of network TV is certainly worth considering. Shortly after the show was jettisoned, CBS began to produce edgier programs more reflective of the times like “All in the Family” and “MASH.” It also influenced writers, producers and comics of today like Ken Burns, Lorne Michaels, David Simon and Bill Maher.

But Bianculli isn’t quite so successful when it comes to pinning the show’s demise on presidents Johnson and Nixon and their influence over CBS. While there is little doubt that both complained about “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour,” the link between the White House and the program’s cancellation is tenuous at best.

No, “The Smothers Brothers Comedy Hour” was packed away for the very reason many shows are cancelled. It became more trouble than it was worth to the executives who make such decisions. And its ratings were going down.

But what Bianculli has delivered here is a well-written chapter in the history of TV and two entertainers who made it more interesting in the mid to late 1960s — and for years to come.

That’s worth remembering.

 

 

The day after, the day after, the day after

February 1st, 2010, 10:27 pm by madisontaylor

Snow and sleet began to fall on Alamance County early Friday evening and nothing has really been right since. Street crews found more ice than expected, clearing roads became a nightmare and some spots didn’t get touched at all until Monday. Public information was scarce from government agencies, decisions weren’t made in a timely manner and communications broke down everywhere.

We weren’t immune at the Times-News.

Monday night we did get closer to our normal midnight deadline. The newsroom finished its pages at 11 p.m. and nothing critical was left out of Tuesday’s newspaper as a sacrifice to improved home delivery on slick Alamance County roads. This morning there is a chance of freezing rain — on top of roads already turned back to ice by 20-degree overnight weather. So I expect the going to be slow for our carriers again.

Monday, though, was already a longer day than expected. I talked to at least three customers who did not receive newspapers Saturday, Sunday or Monday — and they were getting a little sick of it. I can’t blame them, especially since we failed to get in the Carolina basketball game or the Grammy Awards in Monday’s paper because of our very early deadline. Our competitors beat us there. I’m not happy about that one bit.  We can and should do better.

The three customers I communicated with were not the only ones without newspapers for three days. One who called me said it was the first time in 53 years she had been without a Times-News for three straight days. I would’ve liked to see that streak stay unbroken. 

Hopefully we were able to get them some relief on Monday afternoon. I was promised that would happen.

And to all our customers: We learn something new in every situation like the one we faced over the weekend. Hopefully we can apply it when bad weather comes calling again — like the weekend dead ahead.

Thanks again.

On the road again

February 1st, 2010, 7:44 am by madisontaylor

After two days of home confinement due to the ice and snow I had no delusions that my street was icy. I could see that much from my front door.

But I did have high hopes that Garden Road and St. Marks Church Road would be much, much better on Monday morning.

Boy was I wrong.

Both were far worse than my little residential street, which was actually scraped by the city of Burlington at some point on Saturday as the sleet was at its height.

But Garden Road, which techinically is in the county, was a mess. St. Marks Church Road was only marginally better. Church Street was basically clear, with an icy patch here or there. Side roads throughout Burlington were still covered.

Street and road crews for the cities, towns and the state still  face a large task with getting things cleared up enough for easy travel. Warmer temperatures today should help a little, but it looks like more icy weather is coming in tonight on top of it.

My experience this morning was very mild when compared to some of my co-workers. Alex Kreitman, our online content editor, reports that conditions were horrible in Elon and added that the university’s spring semester may face a possible delay on Tuesday should conditions remain as they are.

Alex, a Boston native, said Haggard Avenue had not been cleared and parts of Front Street were in the same shape. “Trying to make a right turn onto Front Street off Haggard Avenue was near impossible,” he said.

Reporter Roselee Papandrea, who actually does the driving in our household, got word from the DOT that today it would focus on uncleared roads such as N.C. 49, 62 and 119 as well as secondary roads. The DOT said I-85/40 was clear as well as N.C. 54, 100, 87 and 70.

But the definition of clear is, well, not clear.

Better late than never

January 31st, 2010, 3:35 pm by madisontaylor

And old photo of home delivery in my wife's old stomping grounds of Syracuse, N.Y. We had better conditions this weekend -- but not by much.

 

Saturday 15 of our carrier routes couldn’t be completed. Sunday we improved that average.

But it took awhile.

Circulation director Doug Johnson said all of our carriers picked up Sunday’s (and in some cases Saturday’s) newspapers for delivery, a few, though, picked them up at daybreak instead of before midnight under our earlier than normal deadline.

For most it was a matter of safety. They felt they could not only see better in the daytime but also call for help if needed should they slip and slide on the 6-plus inches of snow and ice on the roads.

And a few would need it, Doug said.

“ One carrier ran into an embankment and tore up her oil pan and had to wait for assistance and is just finishing.  We had several carriers that got stuck (one right on highway 49) and a couple of others in ditches,” Doug write in an e-mail late Sunday afternoon. 

 ”At this time we still have a handful of carriers still delivering and once they’re done we will have completed 100% delivery,” he continued. “ Unbelievable efforts being made by our carriers to get our subscribers serviced!  We had a lot of carriers that doubled up with carriers that have 4X4 vehicles, a couple with three carriers in their vehicle with papers piled to the roof and stuffed all around them.  They were late but they got their routes done.   Damn, can’t ask for more han that.  All-in-all I couldn’t be more pleased with the efforts made to get our subscribers serviced, from our employees to our carriers.  Job well done!”
 
While I’m sure a couple of customers were missed here or there, it sounds as if our carriers hit absolutely as many as they could at some point on Sunday. For those of us in the newsroom who produce stories, photos, graphics, headlines it’s gratifying to know our carriers did all they could to make sure our product got to all the places it was upposed to go.
 
One more night under an early deadline and hopefully we can return to our normal operating schedule on Monday — when the weather is supposed to get a lot warmer.
 
We look forward to that, believe me.

The good, the bad, and the ugly

January 31st, 2010, 11:24 am by madisontaylor

Newspapers around the Piedmont are struggling to serve their customers. I just got a note on a previous post from Carolyn Lloyd that she had not received her Times-News in two days. One of our photographers, Brad Coville, reported the same. I apologize in both — and all cases — where this is true. And I’m sure it’s a high number.

We knew it would be tough when the first reports of a serious winter storm began last week. Saturday morning, our circulation director Doug Johnson told me that 15 routes were not completed for one reason or another. The primary problem, though, was inaccessible roads. Some parts of Alamance County haven’t seen a scraper or even salt. It hasn’t been above freezing in two days and won’t get there today either.

I haven’t heard from Doug yet about our Sunday delivery average but I’m not optimistic. On the plus side, though, one of our customers, Linda Williams, sent along a nice e-mail complimenting her newspaper carrier for delivering the Times-News on both Saturday and Sunday. She didn’t know his or her name but wanted to make sure we knew she appreciated the effort.

I appreciated her taking the time to say it.

Another reader, Brenda Simpson Jones said she received her Sunday paper but had not seen a Saturday — but admitted it might be buried in the snow and ice (that was the case at my house).

Friends of mine who live in the Triangle area are telling me that serious delivery problems also occurred with the Durham Herald-Sun and Raleigh News and Observer. One, a Sunday New York Times subscriber, didn’t get that either.

As the ice recedes things will get better. But it won’t be soon enough for our customers — or us for that matter.

Thanks for understanding.

Off-road vehicles

January 30th, 2010, 4:25 pm by madisontaylor

The scene today in Graham captured by Mayor Jerry Peterman.

“How are road conditions?” I asked Brad Coville, one of our photographers at the Times-News.

“Poor,” he said without hesitation.

Brad spent most of Saturday riding around Burlington and Alamance County. He drove the main roads, the interstate and some secondary accesses. His assessment at 5 p.m.?

“Poor,” he said again.

Brad is a Michigan native so he knows about snowy and icy roads. He’s no Southern tenderfoot like myself.  Brad also had a previous career in law enforcement so he understands safety, dangerous conditions and what we in the newspaper business call the “Fool Factor.” The Fool Factor is one reason Brad says conditions on roads like Church Street in Burlington are a tad better than those on I-85/40. The interstate is usually pretty clear — but not right now.

“Nobody on Church Street is trying to pass everybody else,” he said.

Yes, Brad says there is ice on all roads — a situation that got worse as the day progressed and “packed snow” turned into something much more sinister. A day chock full of sleet didn’t help. Sleet, in fact, covered roads faster than the city of Burlington could scrape and apply its brine ice-killing solution.

Brad reports that it’s tough stopping vehicles on an incline or at traffic signals. He suspects that’ll only get worse as the night progresses into Sunday morning and temperatures plunge into single-digits.

Our home delivery director Doug Johnson is concerned about carriers from the county areas making it in to pick up newspapers on Saturday night. The night before 15 could not complete their routes before conditions got too bad to continue. Doug fears the situation won’t be any better tonight.

A reminder to readers who do not receive their newspapers that they can access our replica edition online at e.thetimesnews.com.

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site